GPU Performance: Synthetic Benchmarks

The integrated GPU in Meteor Lake-H is a pared down version of the one used in Intel's discrete Arc GPUs. The Meteor Lake-H architecture isolates the media engine and display pipe away from the GPU tile. The new iGPU also includes ray-tracing support.

GPU performance evaluation typically involved gaming workloads, and for select PCs, GPU compute. Prior to that, a look at the capabilities of the GPU in the Core Ultra 5 125H is warranted.

The Intel Arc Graphics in MTL-H is a completely new architecture for the mobile processor market. The iGPU in the F2A processor has one less Xe core, and is also clocked slightly lower. However, it is still good enough to regain parity with the RDNA3-based iGPU in the AMD-based systems, as shown in the benchmarks below.

GFXBench

The DirectX 12-based GFXBench tests from Kishonti are cross-platform, and available all the way down to smartphones. As such, they are not very taxing for discrete GPUs and modern integrated GPUs. We processed the offscreen versions of the 'Aztec Ruins' benchmark.

GFXBench 5.0: Aztec Ruins Normal 1080p Offscreen

GFXBench 5.0: Aztec Ruins High 1440p Offscreen

The numbers depend on the iGPU's power budget allocation, and not just on the PL1 of the package. That said, we see that the F2A 125H and the NUC14RVHv7 perform similarly, with the small delta being attributable to the lowered Xe core count and clock speed.

UL 3DMark

Four different workload sets were processed in 3DMark - Fire Strike, Time Spy, Night Raid, and Wild Life.

3DMark Fire Strike

The Fire Strike benchmark has three workloads. The base version is meant for high-performance gaming PCs. It uses DirectX 11 (feature level 11) to render frames at 1920 x 1080. The Extreme version targets 1440p gaming requirements, while the Ultra version targets 4K gaming system, and renders at 3840 x 2160. The graph below presents the overall score for the Fire Strike Extreme and Fire Strike Ultra benchmark across all the systems that are being compared.

UL 3DMark - Fire Strike Workloads

The RDNA3 iGPU in the Phoenix-based systems manages to come out on top in the two workloads, but the Meteor Lake-based systems are right behind, with the internal ordering the same as what was observed in the previous test.

3DMark Time Spy

The Time Spy workload has two levels with different complexities. Both use DirectX 12 (feature level 11). However, the plain version targets high-performance gaming PCs with a 2560 x 1440 render resolution, while the Extreme version renders at 3840 x 2160 resolution. The graphs below present both numbers for all the systems that are being compared in this review.

UL 3DMark - Time Spy Workloads

The Arc iGPU in Meteor Lake takes up the top four spots in both Time Spy configurations, as shown above. The two Phoenix-based systems take up the next two spots.

3DMark Wild Life

The Wild Life workload was initially introduced as a cross-platform GPU benchmark in 2020. It renders at a 2560 x 1440 resolution using Vulkan 1.1 APIs on Windows. It is a relatively short-running test, reflective of mobile GPU usage. In mid-2021, UL released the Wild Life Extreme workload that was a more demanding version that renders at 3840 x 2160 and runs for a much longer duration reflective of typical desktop gaming usage.

UL 3DMark - Wild Life Workloads

The 1440p version sees the Meteor Lake-based systems on top, but the 4K version sees a much closer fight. The Phoenix-based systems take up three of the first four spots, with the 40W NUC BOX-155H sneaking in-between (thanks to its iGPU power budget allocation). The F2A 125H remains consistently just behind the NUC14RVHv7.

3DMark Night Raid

The Night Raid workload is a DirectX 12 benchmark test. It is less demanding than Time Spy, and is optimized for integrated graphics. The graph below presents the overall score in this workload for different system configurations.

UL 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score

RDNA3 scores a win here, with the Phoenix-based systems taking up the top three spots and followed immediately by the four MTL-H configurations.

3DMark Port Royal

UL introduced the Port Royal ray-tracing benchmark as a DLC for 3DMark in early 2019. The scores serve as an indicator of how the system handles ray-tracing effects in real-time.

UL 3DMark Port Royal Score

RDNA3's ray tracing performance is slightly better than that of MTL-H. The RDNA2 ray tracing in the Rembrandt SoC makes up the bottom half of the pack.

System Performance: Application-Specific Workloads AI Performance: UL Procyon AI Workloads
Comments Locked

11 Comments

View All Comments

  • meacupla - Monday, August 26, 2024 - link

    It is amazing what a few extra cm of space does for the thermals.
    Bonus points for 2x2280 storage, but I wish it supported 3x2280 or 2x22110
  • AdrianBc - Tuesday, August 27, 2024 - link

    I agree with you, which is why I have liked a NUC-like computer with Ryzen AI 3xx that is expected to be launched in October and for whom some preliminary tests of a prototype have been shown on Youtube and linked on various sites with computer news.

    That computer has 3 M.2 2280 sockets, replacing the traditional NUC configuration with 1 M.2 2280 socket + 2 SODIMM sockets.

    This was possible because the SODIMM sockets were replaced with faster soldered LPDDRX memory, selectable as 16 GB, 32 GB or 64 GB.

    I have been using a lot of NUC-like computers for many years, and in my opinion for such computers it is far more useful to be able to install three full-size SSDs, than to be able to replace the DRAM. Therefore I approve the choice made by the designers of that computer.
  • Hulk - Monday, August 26, 2024 - link

    If it is running 4.5GHz during CB R23 ST then that result it horrendous. Like 20% lower IPC-wise (throughput) than a similarly clocked Raptor Cove core.
  • Techie4Us - Monday, August 26, 2024 - link

    Design, features & thermals good, low-tier ram & dram-less SSD.....not so much, especially at this price point....

    If they offered a barebones unit for like ~$400, I might be interested, otherwise..pass....

    Also the spec sheet says " OS = W11 Enterprise", then the pricing part right under that says "W11 HOME"... so which is it and how much difference does this make in the price ?
  • ganeshts - Tuesday, August 27, 2024 - link

    ACEMAGIC sells the system with Win 11 Home pre-installed.

    However, when we test mini-PCs, we always wipe and install Windows 11 Enterprise. It just gives us more features to customize the behavior and prevent surprises while benchmarking.

    The pricing includes the license for Win 11 Home (and that is why the mention of the Home variant is in the Pricing entry).
  • meacupla - Tuesday, August 27, 2024 - link

    IDK what you consider "high-tier ram", but DDR5 SODIMM maxes out at 5600.
  • eastcoast_pete - Monday, August 26, 2024 - link

    Ganesh's advice about wiping the drive and do a complete new install of the OS before usw is, unfortunately, spot on. Other sites and reviewers had found potential malware / spyware on at least one Acemagic mini-PC they evaluated. Acemagic did respond very quickly and tried to explain it away, but Ganesh is 100% correct in pointing out that wiping the drive and a fresh reinstall of the OS is the safe thing to do.
  • haplo602 - Tuesday, August 27, 2024 - link

    Why would anybody buy Intel based miniPCs is beyond my understanding. Unless you need Quicksync the AMD based ones are overall better.
  • nandnandnand - Tuesday, August 27, 2024 - link

    Meteor Lake-H has improved integrated graphics considerably. But it all comes down to price in the end.
  • haplo602 - Wednesday, August 28, 2024 - link

    Given what I have seen with the MSI Claw, it also has terrible power management/distribution between the CPU anf GPU ...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now