HTPC Credentials - Display Outputs and Streaming Capabilities

The comes with display outputs, and their characteristics are summarized in the table below. From a HTPC use-case perspective, the entries of interest include the ability to support UHD (3840 x 2160) or higher resolutions, along with HDCP 2.2. The latter enables the display output to be used for viewing protected content such as 4K Netflix streams and play back UltraHD Blu-rays. It must be noted that this is a necessary, but not sufficient condition.

ASRock Industrial 4X4 BOX-V1000M Display Outputs
  HDMI 2x DisplayPort
Version 2.0a 1.2
Max. Video Output 3840x2160 @ 60Hz 4096x2160 @ 60Hz
HDCP Yes (2.2)
HDR Yes Yes
HD Audio Bitstreaming Yes

Supporting the display of high-resolution protected video content is a requirement for even a casual HTPC user. In addition, HTPC enthusiasts also want their systems to support refresh rates that either match or be an integral multiple of the frame rate of the video being displayed. Most displays / AVRs are able to transmit the supported refresh rates to the PC using the EDID metadata. In some cases, the desired refresh rate might be missing in the list of supported modes.

Refresh Rates Support

Our evaluation of the as a HTPC was done using the native HDMI output connected to a TCL 55P607 4K HDR TV via a Denon AVR-X3400H AV receiver. We tested out various display refresh rates ranging from 23.976 Hz to 59.94 Hz. Of particular interest is the 23.976 Hz (23p) setting, which Intel used to have trouble with in the pre-Broadwell days.

The gallery below presents screenshots from the other refresh rates that were tested. The system has no trouble maintaining a fairly accurate refresh rate throughout the duration of the video playback.

Streaming Services

Despite supporting HDCP 2.2, the absence of a supported secure enclave prevents UltraHD Blu-ray playback on the 4X4 BOX-V1000M. Additionally, PlayReady 3.0 was also not available at the time of review - this meant that 4K and HDR Netflix streams were unavailable, and the maximum quality was limited to 5.8 Mbps / 1080p.

The move to 4K, and the need to evaluate HDR support as part of our HTPC testing have made us choose Mystery Box's Peru 8K HDR 60FPS video as our YouTube test sample. On PCs running Windows, it is recommended that HDR streaming videos be viewed using the Microsoft Edge browser after putting the desktop in HDR mode.

The system has no trouble playing back the VP9 Profile 2 HDR video with hardware acceleration, as evident from the dropped frame statistics in the above screenshot.

Various metrics of interest such as GPU usage and at-wall power consumption were recorded for the first four minutes of the playback of the above video. The numbers are graphed below.

The GPU usage is around 70% and the at-wall power consumption is slightly south of 40W for the 4K HDR YouTube playback test.

Miscellaneous Performance Metrics HTPC Credentials - Local Media Playback and Video Processing
Comments Locked

37 Comments

View All Comments

  • hallstein - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    I just want to say how much I appreciate the title of this article. Great work.
  • deil - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    I will also endorse. Pure perfection. Try doing it with 1185g7, even intel did not try.
  • AMDSuperFan - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    This does not look like a good product for AMD fans. I am very concerned. Where are the products that can compete against someone? $560 and it doesn't even have a battery?
  • DiHydro - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    This is not a consumer product. it is for industrial applications were longevity and support are more important than initial price.
  • PeterEvans - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    Did you have the idea that industrial applications should cost more for longevity? I actuality it is the exact opposite.
  • Spunjji - Tuesday, September 29, 2020 - link

    Re: the only factual part of your post, it's only about $100 more than the near-useless Atom-based "June Canyon" NUC, $40 more than the Coffee Lake DeskMini and nearly $200 less than the Comet Lake "Frost Canyon" NUC - and if you need any GPU power there's no contest between them. But sure, please continue to make disingenuous shitposts in order to feed the thrashing mess of worms inside your brain.
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, September 29, 2020 - link

    Thanks! We've reviewed a lot of NUCs over the years, including AMD ones. So it's an interesting challenge to try to come up with unique titles.
  • tygrus - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    It's a pity the tech is 2 yrs old (Zen 14nm).
    What about:
    4700G
    4900HS
    4800U
    AMD moving slowly to update all product categories but OEM'S are moving even slower. Who or what are holding them back? Does Intel incentives & previous market dominance delay OEM's releasing AMD products or does AMD have some blame?
  • 5080 - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    They do offer this unit with a 4800U, see my comment below.
  • DiHydro - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    This is an industrial mini-PC. Usually used for visual inspection systems, or running GUI controls for machines. They wouldn't need a whole lot of processing power, and would prefer a fully vetted and reliable system (shame about the GPU drivers). That being said, the Ryzen 4000 series is much more attractive for home and office use in the NUC space.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now