CPU Performance, Short Form

For our motherboard reviews, we use our short form testing method. These tests usually focus on if a motherboard is using MultiCore Turbo (the feature used to have maximum turbo on at all times, giving a frequency advantage), or if there are slight gains to be had from tweaking the firmware. We leave the BIOS settings at default and memory at JEDEC for the supported frequency of the processor for these tests, making it very easy to see which motherboards have MCT enabled by default.

* Results with a * were performed with our second Core i9-7900X processor.

Rendering - Blender 2.78: link

For a render that has been around for what seems like ages, Blender is still a highly popular tool. We managed to wrap up a standard workload into the February 5 nightly build of Blender and measure the time it takes to render the first frame of the scene. Being one of the bigger open source tools out there, it means both AMD and Intel work actively to help improve the codebase, for better or for worse on their own/each other's microarchitecture.

Rendering: Blender 2.78

In the Blender testing, the W-2155/X11SRA combo proved to be on the back end of the bell curve a few seconds behind the meat of the results. This is likely due to how turbo can be stricter on Xeon CPUs, and any additional features like Multi-Core Turbo are not present. 

Rendering – POV-Ray 3.7: link

The Persistence of Vision Ray Tracer, or POV-Ray, is a freeware package for as the name suggests, ray tracing. It is a pure renderer, rather than modeling software, but the latest beta version contains a handy benchmark for stressing all processing threads on a platform. We have been using this test in motherboard reviews to test memory stability at various CPU speeds to good effect – if it passes the test, the IMC in the CPU is stable for a given CPU speed. As a CPU test, it runs for approximately 1-2 minutes on high-end platforms.

Rendering: POV-Ray 3.7

For our POV-Ray results, the X11SRA's results land it right in the middle of the pack. Nothing of note here. 

Compression – WinRAR 5.4: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totaling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30-second 720p videos.

Encoding: WinRAR 5.40

WinRAR data places the X11SRA at 34.2 seconds, again in the middle of the pack. 

Synthetic – 7-Zip 9.2: link

As an open source compression tool, 7-Zip is a popular tool for making sets of files easier to handle and transfer. The software offers up its own benchmark, to which we report the result.

Encoding: 7-Zip

Our 7-Zip results are also showing the same trend of matching the datasets we have sitting it with an incredibly tight group of results. 

Point Calculations – 3D Movement Algorithm Test: link

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz, and IPC win in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores. For a brief explanation of the platform agnostic coding behind this benchmark, see my forum post here.

System: 3D Particle Movement v2.1

Similarly, the 3DPM result lands the X11SRA in the middle of the pack. Nothing anomalous here.

Neuron Simulation - DigiCortex v1.20: link

The newest benchmark in our suite is DigiCortex, a simulation of biologically plausible neural network circuits, and simulates activity of neurons and synapses. DigiCortex relies heavily on a mix of DRAM speed and computational throughput, indicating that systems which apply memory profiles properly should benefit and those that play fast and loose with overclocking settings might get some extra speed up. Results are taken during the steady state period in a 32k neuron simulation and represented as a function of the ability to simulate in real time (1.000x equals real-time).

System: DigiCortex 1.20 (32k Neuron, 1.8B Synapse)

Last, the DigiCortex testing shows the Supermicro X11SRA in the middle of the pack with a result of 1.16 fraction of real-time simulation possible. These results are also very tightly packed together with nothing out of the ordinary to report. 

System Performance Gaming Performance
Comments Locked

57 Comments

View All Comments

  • tricomp - Wednesday, May 30, 2018 - link

    No Ryzen to buy Intel
  • Psycho_McCrazy - Wednesday, May 30, 2018 - link

    So many X299 mobo reviews and now a WS one, so niche.
    Spare a thought for us mortals looking for AM4 B350 boards. Mini ITX AM4 mobo reviews anyone?
  • ruthan - Wednesday, May 30, 2018 - link

    Gaming charts are almost useless for me, i want to see comparision with 7820x and 8700K.. I now that gaming performance wouldnt be better, but not everybody have enough money and room for separated gaming and working PC..
  • bill.rookard - Wednesday, May 30, 2018 - link

    Well, that sucks. It used to be that you could buy some regular boards, and eventually through server replacements get a hold of Xeons on the secondary used market. These are actually quite useful, and decently powerful.

    Now, server motherboards and chipsets will be required. Grr....
  • Sartorial - Wednesday, May 30, 2018 - link

    Does it support bifurcating / "quadfurcating" PCI-E slots for passive M.2 risers?
  • cinematicket - Thursday, May 31, 2018 - link

    New points are continually giving new learning.So as a reader this is very informative and intreseting topic.
    https://bookbyq.com/
  • porcusRex - Thursday, May 31, 2018 - link

    im in the market for a new workstation. I would like to see this motherboard compared to the Asus WS C422 pro/se. build will be used for developement/db work and to run VMs. plan is for 128 g memory and xeon w-2155. the only other available board only supports 64 G memory i think.
  • stanbessami - Thursday, December 6, 2018 - link

    Excellent scalability, full support for the Broadwell-EP family up to E5-2699 v4 from BIOS 2.0. There are all modern and really necessary connectors. Technical support manufacturer, fresh bios.
    All stores indicate in the description that the memory is only ECC REG, but this is not the case, it works fine with regular 2133 boards. Really effective energy saving options specified in the specification. Power, reliability, a decent manufacturer in its segment "SUPERMICRO". Price = quality. By the way, I write argumentative essays and reviews for https://writemyessayonline.com/, where you will also find a lot of useful information, as well as be able to order any paperwork.
  • hansmuff - Monday, March 25, 2019 - link

    Maybe IPMI isn't a requirement in a workstation class board, but it sure would be nice especially at this price. My X10 Supermicro server board was only about $220 and has IPMI. It would be a nice distinguisher in this space.
  • charliejoe752 - Tuesday, July 16, 2019 - link

    Hey, Thanks for sharing, very useful information about the chipset technology. I provide the students with essay help online(https://www.assignmenthelp4me.com/essay-help.html)... I am presently working with Assignment Help 4 Me, the website that is best among all the service providers and has 100% customer satisfaction.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now